On this page
Global mono-ethylene glycol production reached a scale large enough to shape pricing across all major industrial regions in 2025, and this backdrop frames the current cost environment. Regional benchmarks illustrate the spread: The United States traded near 516 to 525 USD per tonne in Q1 to Q2 and about 513 USD per tonne in Q3, China ranged 572 to 591 USD per tonne, Germany held near 630 USD per tonne, Saudi Arabia registered 576 to 584 USD per tonne, and Brazil hovered around 565 USD per tonne. These values show how feedstock structures, freight dynamics and local availability shape regional differentiation.
Price behaviour closely tracks upstream ethylene economics, which in turn depends on naphtha, ethane and natural gas conditions. When ethylene turns inexpensive, MEG margins expand and spot values soften for import-dependent markets. When gas or naphtha prices rise or when major regional producers reduce output, MEG prices tighten almost immediately. Low-carbon or bio-derived glycol concepts are shaping long-term expectations, though their impact remains limited as volumes remain small.
Large new integrated complexes often stabilise global pricing by adding reliable supply. At the same time, localised regulatory measures, duties or port congestion can lift landed prices in individual regions. Short-term tightness appears when multi-plant maintenance overlaps or when feedstock interruptions affect ethylene output. Global consumption reflects a steady pull from polyester and PET packaging, with industrial fluid uses providing stable but smaller baseload demand.
MEG consumption is shaped by a discrete set of product forms aligned with downstream operational needs. Buyers focus on purity, moisture and impurity levels, compatibility with polymerisation systems and, increasingly, carbon intensity metrics.
Industrial and commodity grades supply the dominant volume and shape global benchmarks. Polyester and PET grades align with the massive textile and packaging ecosystems, where purity consistency and polymer clarity matter. Specialty and industrial grades sell at premiums driven by freeze-point performance, additive interaction and impurity limits. Low-carbon MEG supports early ESG initiatives among brand owners and some chemical buyers, though availability and pricing still limit broad adoption.
Key questions answered (product)
Technology pathways frame MEG’s cost, emission profile and scalability. While most global supply uses the ethylene oxide hydration route, upgrades and alternatives are emerging.
Conventional ethylene-to-MEG complexes serve polyester and PET markets through competitive scale economics. Optimised processes reduce energy intensity and improve quality consistency, appealing to fibre and PET facilities with tight polymerisation requirements. Low-carbon pathways attract buyers with defined ESG targets, especially consumer brands and packaging players, but capacity remains constrained.
Key questions answered (process)
MEG sits inside a highly concentrated set of end uses dominated by polyester and PET. Industrial fluids and niche chemical systems form the balance.
Polyester fibre producers rely on MEG for cost-efficient and predictable polymer feed. PET resin makers depend on MEG for clarity, mechanical performance and food-contact reliability. Industrial fluid producers value MEG’s freeze protection and thermal properties. Niche chemical applications utilise high-purity MEG for selective reactions and controlled impurity profiles.
Key questions answered (end use)
Recent ethane-based expansions strengthened MEG supply positions. Producers serve domestic PET and polyester chains while exporting into Europe and Asia. Feedstock advantage supports competitive pricing, and logistics infrastructure favours long-term supply reliability.
Europe relies heavily on imports. Energy costs and environmental rules shape procurement decisions. Buyers emphasise documentation, lifecycle attributes and stable specifications.
Asia Pacific remains the largest combined production and consumption hub. Polyester and PET dominate regional pull. Policy reviews, local feedstock shifts and plant utilisation rates strongly influence global MEG sentiment.
Middle Eastern complexes benefit from low-cost gas and large-scale integration. They supply competitive MEG into Asia and Europe and help anchor global contract benchmarks.
Mostly import dependent with selective domestic projects. Freight conditions and port performance heavily influence landed cost and supply reliability.
Key questions answered (regional)
MEG supply begins with ethylene feedstock, followed by EO production and hydration. Feedstock cost forms the largest share of total cost, followed by energy, utilities, and logistics. Water and effluent management also influence operating feasibility in some regions.
Global trade flows move significant volumes from the Middle East and North America to Asia and Europe. Asia alternates between net importer and balanced positions depending on plant availability and downstream margins. Freight stability and container availability influence landed cost, prompting buyers to diversify origins and contract formats.
Key questions answered (supply, cost, trade)
The MEG ecosystem spans ethylene suppliers, EO licensors, MEG producers, purification and additive specialists, distributors, polyester and PET makers, and logistics partners. Major producers maintain influence through integrated footprints and scale, while emerging low-carbon suppliers introduce new choices for ESG-driven users. Technology providers shape yield, energy efficiency and impurity management. Regulatory trends influence documentation needs and carbon reporting.
Explore Hydrocarbons, Petrochemicals, and Organic Chemicals Insights
View Reports
Global Mono-ethylene glycol Production and Price Trend Analysis
Thank you!
You will receive an email from our Business Development Manager. Please be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folder too.
